pharry06的部落格

Axiom 1: Feeling[endnote1] is non-spatial.
In other than words, no sympathetic of feeling, e.g. inkling of in the flesh pain, can be painted by any spacial artifact.

The fear of corporeal pain, for example, is conceptually clear from its bodily opposite number (i.e. identification of whatsoever chemical science gesture in psyche).[endnote2]

a.This conceptual prominence is self - plain / obvious.

Most recent information:

b.The comprehension of the act of designation of chemistry gesture is neither basic nor enough to have the culture of the feeling of animal pain, for variety.[endnote3]

Axiom 2: Feeling is definite and material/material.

Axiom 3: Any experience, even an abstract brainwave I know I am having, is, in fact, a impression.

Pattern

Axiom 4: The self/I is 'feeling'.
In remaining words, the same/I is not thing diametric from 'feeling' that 'feels', but is itself 'feeling'. For example, 'I'm foreboding pain' is nakedness a feeling. There is no 'I', which, in nature, is not a attitude and still feels something.

Axiom 5: The self/I is a stream of morale.

Suppose I grain to have cloth sighted cobalt color. Now, though the passion of seeing cerulean color itself is not 'the awareness of same/I'[endnote4], the one-time opinion is (conceptually) connected next to the latter.

Axiom 6: Every idea represents several opinion/concept/thought.

The emotion of dark blue colour, for example, is the aforesaid as the content/concept/thought of chromatic tint.

The six axioms declared above are meant to be 'self-evident truths'. That is, they are not mere postulates. Now, it may be that no of them are obvious reported to the reader. However, all of them are clear according to the critic. A unanalyzable statistical axiom, suchlike if p implies q and p is true next q is true, for example, may be self-evident according to a human of normal intellect, for it involves simple, easy-to-understand concepts. On the different the 6 axioms regard relatively untold profound, hard-to-understand concepts, thus potentially proper 'non-self-evident' (i.e. axiomatically uncomprehensible) reported to a human of intermediate mind.

Theorem 1: The same/I is an NSTP (Non - Spatial Thinking Process).[endnote5]

Conjecture 1: Space[endnote6] is mere (non-spatial) reaction.
In different words, space, where the funny phenomena suchlike quantum non-locality be there in, is a practical (i.e. an trompe-l'oeil) entity. It is a mere semblance.

The inhibition of quantity non-locality -

'In 1997 experiments were conducted in which neutral particles (i.e. photons) originated underneath correct requisites and traveled in conflicting directions to detectors placed in the order of seven miles isolated. The amazing grades indicated that the photons interacted or communicated with one different like a shot or in no instance.'[endnote7]

A Solution -

1. No real spatial exploit can put together the photons be to send next to one other immediately or in no occurrence.[endnote8]

2. Space, where on earth the singular phenomena similar to quantum non-locality survive in, is not genuine.

3. Axiom 3 implies that at hand is (non-spatial) fancy of opportunity.

Points 2 and 3 indicate possibility 1.

Conjecture 2: The Superhuman Engine.
Superhuman thoughts, representing the semiempirical laws (i.e. man responsible for the experiential order, e.g. gravity, quantity non-locality, etc., in the non-superhuman NSTP/s), be in the constitute of (non-spatial) emotional state.

1. A Non-Superhuman NSTP- Let's income a natural model of gravitational force. Consider an human x holding a game equipment at duration d from the crushed. At juncture t=1 x has the emotion of dropping the orb.[endnote9] At t=2 x has the thought of seeing the game equipment at ¾d. At t=3 x has the intuition of sighted the ball at ½d. At t=4 x has the fear of seeing the game equipment at ¼d. And lastly, at t=5 x has the notion of sighted the orb at d=0. Now, referring to theorem 1 this impermanent formula of sensitiveness is an NSTP (Non - Spatial Thinking Process).

2. i) Since the empiric (i.e. a posteriori) writ[endnote10] in this NSTP, for example, is not consistently required location should be something else, personal/material, responsible for it.
ii) Also, any natural event/modification in specified geographical/material entity would devolution/modify the confirmable order, which, anyone logically not necessary, should other be variable/modifiable.[endnote11]

3. The Superhuman Engine- Such corporeal/material entity is zilch but few superhuman[endnote12] judgment that denote the existential religious writing and ideas, for prototype the law and opinion of attractive force in the lawsuit of the NSTP mentioned in spear 1. The godlike judgment likewise live in the develop of (non-spatial) morale.[endnote13] Thus, returning to the illustration of gravity, the emotional state of attractive force[endnote14] are make in an peaceful chain because (superhuman) thoughts, representing the empirical laws, be real.[endnote15] Such divine philosophy could put together be suitable as 'The Superhuman Engine'.

4. Superhuman vs. Non-Superhuman NSTP/s- As each powerful musing exists done time, its specified temporal living constitutes an NSTP (Non - Spatial Thinking Process). Thus, to sum up, the mere years of the superhuman NSTPs is culpable for the peaceful years of the non-superhuman NSTP/s[endnote16].

Conjecture 3: There is a chance of the experience of space, the abstraction where on earth the phenomena close to quantity non-locality do not live in.
In opposite words, opportunity may be truly existing, the opportunity where phenomena same quantum non-locality do not subsist in.

1. Conjecture 1 merely denies the trueness of space, the extraterrestrial where the curious phenomena like quantum non-locality be real in.

2. Physical phenomena close to quantum non-locality are not reasonably required. Therefore it is other possible that quantity non-locality does not be there.

Points 1 and 2 show speculation 3.

If, in case, it happens that we find no quantum non-locality ongoing at several instance (where it should otherwise be in existence), that does not needfully tight that we, as non-spatial entities, are connected near the scope that perhaps exists reported to rumour 3, because superhuman ideas may include decree to kill no morale representing quantum non-locality, for whichever juncture.

Also, the NSTP hypothesis could assumption that space, wherever the phenomena like quantum non-locality be there in, is real, and the sharp existence of the herculean imaginings form the photons connect next to all other in no instance. However, such rumour would engineer the classic of the (material) natural object "unnecessarily" hard since in attendance would be cardinal entities interested (viz. divine thoughts, non-superhuman thoughts, and space, wherever the phenomena like quantity non-locality be in) alternatively of of late two (viz. divine assessment and non-superhuman accepted wisdom).

The NSTP Theory's Semi-Idealism and Semi-Dualism -

1. The NSTP notion is semi-idealistic in that, though, like (pure) (ontological) idealism, it reduces opportunity to non-spatial mind, the span where the phenomena like quantum non-locality be real in, it conjectures a option of the authenticity of space, the outer space where the phenomena resembling quantum non-locality do not survive in, whereas (pure) (ontological) idealism accepts no probability of the experience of heavens.

2. The NSTP suggestion is semi-dualistic in that, it reduces space, where on earth the phenomena similar to quantity non-locality live in, to non-spatial mind, whereas (pure) (mind-body) ism accepts no such as reduction. Also, unlike (pure) (mind-body) dualism, the non-spatial and the spatial (that maybe exists reported to supposition 3) ontologies in the NSTP proposition carnivore no correlation with each other, for the one-time involves the phenomena like quantum non-locality, whereas the latter involves no such phenomena.

The NSTP Theory's Resemblance next to Berkeley's Idealism and Descartes' Dualism -

1. The NSTP theory, as an idealistic theory, resembles Berkeley's philosophical theory as the spacial worldly entities, even when, at times, not weathered by non-superhuman NSTP/s, exist because divine NSTPs exist, representing them, the spatial substance entities, as design.

2. The NSTP theory, as a manichaean theory, resembles Descartes' Dualism as, inside its axiomatic framework, it asserts the time of non-spatial ontology near certainty, and, inside its suppositious framework, it asserts the time of spatial ontology near vacillation.

Notes -

1 Throughout this work, the residence 'feeling' mechanism extraordinary head / state of mind / qualia.

2 A prickle subsequent an axiom, a theorem, or different point, is meant to be its version and/or exoneration.

3 For much content see Jackson, Frank. 1982. "Epiphenomenal Qualia", Philosophical Quarterly 32, pp. 127-136.

4 'The attitude of self/I' is null but what scheme by saying 4.

5 Theorem 1 is silent by the axioms 1, 5, and 6.

6 Space as a liberty or emptiness out there: whether cardinal or sophisticated dimensional, enclosed or unbounded, where the singular phenomena approaching quantum non-locality subsist in.

7 Nadeau, Robert and Kafatos, Menas (1999) The non-local universe: the new natural philosophy and matters of the psyche. OUP, Oxford.

8 Theories (for example, Bohm's supposition of the implicate proclaim and united comprehensiveness) that bash to contribute (spatial) mechanical elucidation of the unreal photonic manner clear the worthy of the cosmos without reason knotty. Also, Bohm's theory, for example, is in divergence near platitude 1.

9 On the spring of maxim 4 and platitude 5 we can say that at instance t=1 x is relative quantity but a opinion of falling the globe.

10 That is, the bidding of gravity- if, nether the aforementioned conditions, the play at in ingredient 1 is recurrent for immeasurable times the one and the same benignant of gravitational attraction would be experienced.

11 In inference beside (spatial) of our own computers (PCs), the bid in the propulsive form on the monitor silver screen is created by many intermediate hardware representing whatsoever bright software, and if the computer code instructions or parameters (ultimately whatever weapons system cut-out) are changed, the renascent shape on the display screen could be changed, or even be obliterated.

12 The belief are understood to be divine because non-superhuman, in particular- human, thoughts, in general- mind, are incapable of feat anything close to attraction.

13 It is a assumption.

14 All 5 atmosphere at modern times t=1 to t=5 wherever gravitational attraction is tough.

15 Due to the existence of the godlike thoughts, more than one individual may as well go through the state of mind of gravitational attraction at the same time.

16 It may be that I am the with the sole purpose non-superhuman NSTP to exist, for here may not be any (non-superhuman) NSTPs related to the non-superhuman (illusive) abstraction objects.